Push notifications are the bridge between real-time communication and real-world user behavior. When implemented correctly, push notifications keep conversations alive, messages timely and users engaged. When implemented poorly – they become a source of frustration, missed messages and eventually app uninstalls.
In chat applications especially, push notifications are not a “nice to have” feature. They are part of the core messaging infrastructure. This article explores how push notifications work in chat apps, the platform-specific nuances of Android and iOS, and the best practices developers should follow to build a reliable, scalable and user-friendly notification system.
Push notifications as part of chat architecture
In a real-time chat system, push notifications act as a fallback transport. When a client is connected via WebSocket or another persistent channel, messages are delivered instantly. When the client is disconnected, backgrounded or terminated, push notifications become the only way to notify the user that a new event has occurred.
This duality creates a fundamental architectural requirement: push notifications must be consistent with real-time message delivery, not independent from it. A push notification should never be the source of truth for message content. Instead, it should act as a signal that prompts the client to synchronize state with the backend.
Well-designed chat systems treat push notifications as event triggers, not message containers.
Platform push services and their constraints
Android and iOS rely on fundamentally different push delivery models, even though they serve the same purpose.
On Android – Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) provides a relatively permissive environment. Applications can receive data payloads, perform limited background processing and decide how notifications should be displayed. However, this flexibility is balanced by aggressive battery optimization features such as Doze mode, App Standby Buckets and background execution limits.
On iOS – Apple Push Notification service (APNs) is far more restrictive. Background execution is tightly controlled, silent notifications are opportunistic rather than guaranteed, and misuse of push mechanisms can directly impact delivery reliability. Apple treats push notifications as a privileged system resource and applications must operate within narrow constraints to remain compliant.
A production-grade chat app must be designed with these differences in mind from the start.
Payload design and message semantics
One of the most common architectural mistakes in chat apps is embedding full message content directly into push notification payloads. While this may appear convenient, it creates multiple long-term problems:
- both FCM and APNs impose payload size limits
- push payloads are not encrypted end-to-end in the same way as message transport channels
- push delivery is not guaranteed, which means payload-based message delivery can lead to data loss or inconsistency.
The correct approach is to include only identifiers and minimal metadata in push payloads. Typical payload data should include:
- Conversation or dialog identifierSender identifier
- Event type (message, call, mention, system event)
- Timestamp or sequence marker
When the client receives the push, it should fetch the actual message content from the backend. This ensures consistency, allows message history recovery and keeps push notifications lightweight and reliable.
Android delivery behavior and execution model
Android allows two primary push message types: notification messages and data messages. For chat applications, data messages are almost always preferable, because they allow the application to decide how and when notifications should be shown.
Delivery priority plays a critical role in Android push behavior. High-priority messages can wake the device and bypass certain battery optimizations, while normal-priority messages are deferred to preserve power. In chat apps, high priority should be reserved for user-visible, time-sensitive events such as direct messages or calls. Overusing high priority leads to throttling and degraded delivery over time.
Background execution limits further complicate Android delivery. When the app is idle, background services may not start immediately, and network access may be delayed. For this reason, push handlers must be lightweight, deterministic, and short-lived. Any complex logic should be deferred until the app is brought to the foreground.
Notification channels are also essential for long-term usability. They allow developers to separate message notifications, group notifications, and call notifications into distinct categories, giving users control without disabling notifications entirely.
iOS delivery behavior and background limitations
iOS enforces stricter delivery rules that significantly affect chat app behavior. Silent notifications can be used to trigger background updates, but delivery is opportunistic and depends on system heuristics such as app usage patterns, battery state, and network conditions.
Apple explicitly discourages using silent notifications as a real-time transport mechanism. Instead, they should be treated as hints that allow the app to update state when conditions permit.
Alert notifications, while more reliable in terms of user visibility, should be used sparingly. Excessive alerts degrade user experience and increase the likelihood that users will disable notifications or that the system will reduce delivery priority.
For call-related events, iOS provides PushKit and VoIP pushes, which are designed for immediate delivery and allow the app to present an incoming call UI even when terminated. These notifications are tightly regulated and must only be used for genuine call events.
Payload size limitations on iOS reinforce the principle of minimal push content. Including identifiers rather than message bodies improves delivery reliability and keeps the system compliant with Apple’s guidelines.
State synchronization and message consistency
A push notification should never be the sole trigger for displaying a message. Chat applications must always synchronize message state with the backend upon app activation.
This includes:
- fetching missed messages
- resolving message ordering
- updating read receipts
- handling duplicate events
Push notifications can arrive out of order, arrive late or fail to arrive entirely. A robust chat app assumes that any of these scenarios can occur and uses server-side state as the authoritative source.
Sequence IDs, timestamps, and message versioning are essential tools for maintaining consistency across devices and sessions.
Notification suppression and context awareness
Context-aware notification delivery is critical in chat apps. If a user is actively viewing a conversation, sending a push notification for that same conversation adds no value and actively harms the experience.
Advanced chat systems track:
- app foreground/background state
- active dialog identifiers
- user presence and session activity
Using this information, the backend can suppress or downgrade notifications dynamically. This reduces noise, improves engagement, and preserves user trust.
Security and privacy considerations
Push notifications often carry metadata that can reveal communication patterns. Even without message content, identifiers and timestamps can be sensitive.
For this reason:
- Push payloads should never contain confidential message content
- Backend systems must validate permissions before sending notifications
- Tokens should be securely stored and rotated
- Invalid or expired tokens should be removed promptly
In regulated environments, push notifications must also comply with privacy and data residency requirements, especially when third-party push services are involved.
Scalability and high-volume delivery
At scale, push notifications become a throughput and reliability problem. Large chat systems may need to handle millions of push events per minute during peak usage.
Scalable architectures typically include:
- Asynchronous push queues
- Rate limiting and batching
- Retry mechanisms with exponential backoff
- Separation of transactional and non-critical notifications
Monitoring delivery success rates and platform feedback is essential. Silent failures can accumulate unnoticed and degrade user experience over time.
Useful links to explore
Encrypted Push Notifications in React Native
Troubleshooting common issues with VoIP Push Notifications on iOS
Finally to say
Push notifications in chat applications are not a simple messaging feature. They are a distributed system problem that spans backend infrastructure, mobile operating systems, network conditions, and user psychology.
A technically sound implementation treats push notifications as signals rather than data carriers, respects platform constraints, and prioritizes state synchronization over payload delivery. When designed correctly, push notifications become an invisible yet essential part of a seamless chat experience.
For chat applications aiming for reliability, scalability, and long-term user trust, push notifications must be engineered with the same care as the core messaging system itself.
If you don’t want to worry about push notifications at all- sign up for ConnectyCube, use ready-to-use APIs and clear documentation to build Android and iOS chat apps without dealing with push infrastructure complexity.
👉 Get started with ConnectyCube
—
Join the ConnectyCube Discord сommunity for quick answers and expert tips
